On Wednesday, 28 February 2007 21:35, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 02/28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Okay, but I've just finished the patch that removes the freezability of
> > workqueues (appended), so can we please do this in a separate one?
>
> Please, please, no. This patch is of course correct, but it breaks _a lot_
> of patches in -mm tree.
>
> May I ask you to send just
>
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.21-rc2.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
> > +++ linux-2.6.21-rc2/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
> > @@ -1829,11 +1829,11 @@ xfs_buf_init(void)
> > if (!xfs_buf_zone)
> > goto out_free_trace_buf;
> >
> > - xfslogd_workqueue = create_freezeable_workqueue("xfslogd");
> > + xfslogd_workqueue = create_workqueue("xfslogd");
> > if (!xfslogd_workqueue)
> > goto out_free_buf_zone;
> >
> > - xfsdatad_workqueue = create_freezeable_workqueue("xfsdatad");
> > + xfsdatad_workqueue = create_workqueue("xfsdatad");
> > if (!xfsdatad_workqueue)
> > goto out_destroy_xfslogd_workqueue;
> >
> >
>
> this bit?
>
> After that, we can do the "removes the freezability of workqueues" patch
> against -mm tree.
Okay, if that's better.
Pavel, is that acceptable to you?
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
