On Fri, 4 Nov 2016, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 04/11/2016 16:06, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > With no usage? Sounds like a good use of Acked-by. :)
> > I don't understand what do you mean here?
>
> I mean that the changes to scattered.c are small, so it makes no sense
> to split them. With an Acked-by I could simply take the patch into my tree.
Nope. We have other changes in that area coming up, so I rather take the
cpuid bits into tip and provide you a branch with that commit to pull from.
Thanks,
tglx
