Since I was CC-ed, I'll add in my opinion:
While Geert already pointed out the spelling mistake (_in_or_our >> _in_or_out), since that function is only just for qspi versions, a better function name should have been "qspi_pio_transfer_in_or_out" However.... On 11/8/2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > This simplifies it again by keeping the two separate, which then ends up > avoiding that warning. I agree with Arnd's method of NOT adding a new "rspi_pio_transfer_in_or_our" function and instead just doing it in the existing qspi_transfer_ functions. Side note: The RSPI in the RZ/A1 devices also have FIFOs which can be used to reduce the number of interrupts in pio transfers, so maybe someday I'll make a similar change for non-qspi devices as well. Chris
