On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 11:39:21AM +0100, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > On 11/03/2016 11:10 AM, Andi Shyti wrote: > > Hi Jacek, > > > > > Only DT bindings of LED class drivers should be placed in > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds. Please move it to the > > > media bindings. > > > > that's where I placed it first, but Rob asked me to put it in the > > LED directory and Cc the LED mailining list. > > > > That's the discussion of the version 2: > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/12/380 > > > > Rob, Jacek, could you please agree where I can put the binding? > > I'm not sure if this is a good approach. I've noticed also that > backlight bindings have been moved to leds, whereas they don't look > similarly. > > We have common.txt LED bindings, that all LED class drivers' bindings > have to follow. Neither backlight bindings nor these ones do that, > which introduces some mess.
And there are probably LED bindings that don't follow common.txt either. > Eventually adding a sub-directory, e.g. remote_control could make it > somehow logically justified, but still - shouldn't bindings be > placed in the documentation directory related to the subsystem of the > driver they are predestined to? No. While binding directories often mirror the driver directories, they are not the same. Bindings are grouped by types of h/w and IR LEDs are a type of LED. If you prefer a sub-dir, that is fine with me. Rob
