> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Walle [mailto:mich...@walle.cc]
> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2016 12:04 AM
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org; Ulf Hansson; Adrian Hunter; yangbo lu;
> Michael Walle
> Subject: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: fixup PRESENT_STATE read
> 
> Since commit 87a18a6a5652 ("mmc: mmc: Use ->card_busy() to detect busy
> cards in __mmc_switch()") the ESDHC driver is broken:
>   mmc0: Card stuck in programming state! __mmc_switch
>   mmc0: error -110 whilst initialising MMC card
> 
> Since this commit __mmc_switch() uses ->card_busy(), which is
> sdhci_card_busy() for the esdhc driver. sdhci_card_busy() uses the
> PRESENT_STATE register, specifically the DAT0 signal level bit. But the
> ESDHC uses a non-conformant PRESENT_STATE register, thus a read fixup is
> required to make the driver work again.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <mich...@walle.cc>
> Fixes: 87a18a6a5652 ("mmc: mmc: Use ->card_busy() to detect busy cards in
> __mmc_switch()")
> ---
> v2:
>  - use lower bits of the original value (that was actually a typo)
>  - add fixes tag
>  - fix typo
> 
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-
> of-esdhc.c
> index fb71c86..f9c84bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
> @@ -66,6 +66,18 @@ static u32 esdhc_readl_fixup(struct sdhci_host *host,
>                       return ret;
>               }
>       }
> +     /*
> +      * The DAT[3:0] line signal levels and the CMD line signal level is
> +      * not compatible with standard SDHC register. Move the
> corresponding
> +      * bits around.
> +      */
> +     if (spec_reg == SDHCI_PRESENT_STATE) {
> +             ret = value & ~0xf8000000;

[Lu Yangbo-B47093] I think the bits which should be cleaned before following 
'|=' are 0x01f00000 not 0xf8000000, right?
:)

> +             ret |= (value >> 4) & SDHCI_DATA_LVL_MASK;
> +             ret |= (value << 1) & 0x01000000;
> +             return ret;
> +     }
> +
>       ret = value;
>       return ret;
>  }
> --
> 2.1.4

Reply via email to