On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Chris Metcalf <cmetc...@mellanox.com> wrote:
> This bugfix was originally made in commit 35a4933a8959 ("time:
> Avoid signed overflow in timekeeping_get_ns()"). When the code was
> refactored in commit 6bd58f09e1d8 ("time: Add cycles to nanoseconds
> translation") the signed overflow fix was lost. Re-introduce it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetc...@mellanox.com>
> ---
> I happened to be looking for an unrelated fix, found this code,
> realized the tip code didn't match the fixed code, and
> backtracked to where it had gone away.
>
> kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> index 37dec7e3db43..57926bc7b7f3 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> @@ -304,8 +304,7 @@ static inline s64 timekeeping_delta_to_ns(struct
> tk_read_base *tkr,
> {
> s64 nsec;
>
> - nsec = delta * tkr->mult + tkr->xtime_nsec;
> - nsec >>= tkr->shift;
> + nsec = (delta * tkr->mult + tkr->xtime_nsec) >> tkr->shift;
Ugh.
So... I think this proves the original fix was *far* too subtle to
maintain. So I think reintroducing it as-is doesn't protect us from
undoing it. If the problem is really using the signed intermediate
nsec value, we should get rid of that.
thanks
-john
