On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 08:42:45AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 06:39:46PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Thanks so much for doing these, at the very least, I want to take the > > kref-abuse-fixes now as those users shouldn't be doing those foolish > > things. Any objection for me taking some of them through my tree now? > > Very nice series indeed! > > We normally route atomics related patches through tip:locking/core (there's > also > tip:atomic/core), but this is a special case I think, given how broadly it > interacts with driver code. > > So both would work I think: we could concentrate these and only these patches > into > tip:atomic/core into an append-only tree, or you can carry them in the driver > tree > - whichever variant you prefer!
I have no objection for them going through a tip:whataver tree/branch, if you all want to do that, it makes it easier for me :) I'm guessing another series will come out before they get merged there, so I'll hold off on providing an Acked-by: until then. thanks, greg k-h