On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 05:02:56PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday, August 22, 2016 8:33:17 PM CEST Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/signal.h
> > b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/signal.h
> > index 33073bd..859f2de 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/signal.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/signal.h
> > @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ struct sigaction {
> > typedef struct sigaltstack {
> > void __user *ss_sp;
> > int ss_flags;
> > - size_t ss_size;
> > + __kernel_size_t ss_size;
> > } stack_t;
>
> I was going to reply with an Ack, but on further consideration,
> I'm not sure if we can't do this in general: size_t may be either
> 'unsigned int' or 'unsigned long' (depending on the architecture
> and toolchain), and if kernel and glibc disagree on this, we
> have a problem with any user space code that expects sigaltstack->ss_size
> to be the same type as size_t (as mandated by the man page).
>
> I wonder if there is another way to address this.
I presume that kernel headers need to follow libc in this case and include
<stddef.h>?
-Mikko
