On 11/16, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:29 AM, Stephen Boyd <sb...@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> > On 11/15, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> >> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static int qfprom_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> static struct nvmem_config econfig = {
> >> .name = "qfprom",
> >> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> >> - .stride = 4,
> >> + .stride = 1,
> >
> > Are we certain that all qfproms support byte accesses?
>
> I have tested on 8916 and 8996. Will give a try on older targets as
> well.
>
> For a note: we had been using the reg_stride = 1, before removing
> regmap support for nvmem access [1].
>
> [1] 382c62f nvmem: qfprom: remove nvmem regmap dependency
>
>
Ah ok. If we were doing byte accesses before then I have no
concerns.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
