From: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
The check loop for the cpu type is pointless as we already have a cpu model
match before that. The only thing which is not covered by that check would
be a smp system with two different cores. Not likely to happen.
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelv...@suse.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net>
Cc: linux-hw...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bige...@linutronix.de>
---
drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c | 16 +---------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c
index ac91c07e3f90..5b9866b1b437 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c
@@ -319,22 +319,8 @@ static int __init via_cputemp_init(void)
goto exit;
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
- for_each_online_cpu(i) {
- struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(i);
-
- if (c->x86 != 6)
- continue;
-
- if (c->x86_model < 0x0a)
- continue;
-
- if (c->x86_model > 0x0f) {
- pr_warn("Unknown CPU model 0x%x\n", c->x86_model);
- continue;
- }
-
+ for_each_online_cpu(i)
via_cputemp_device_add(i);
- }
#ifndef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
if (list_empty(&pdev_list)) {
--
2.10.2
