From: Joel Fernandes <joe...@google.com> Use cond_resched_lock to avoid holding the vmap_area_lock for a potentially long time and thus creating bad latencies for various workloads.
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joe...@google.com> [hch: split from a larger patch by Joel, wrote the crappy changelog] Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> Tested-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszh...@marvell.com> --- mm/vmalloc.c | 14 +++++++++----- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c index dccf242..976db21 100644 --- a/mm/vmalloc.c +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c @@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ static bool __purge_vmap_area_lazy(unsigned long start, unsigned long end) struct llist_node *valist; struct vmap_area *va; struct vmap_area *n_va; - int nr = 0; + bool do_free = false; lockdep_assert_held(&vmap_purge_lock); @@ -638,18 +638,22 @@ static bool __purge_vmap_area_lazy(unsigned long start, unsigned long end) start = va->va_start; if (va->va_end > end) end = va->va_end; - nr += (va->va_end - va->va_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT; + do_free = true; } - if (!nr) + if (!do_free) return false; - atomic_sub(nr, &vmap_lazy_nr); flush_tlb_kernel_range(start, end); spin_lock(&vmap_area_lock); - llist_for_each_entry_safe(va, n_va, valist, purge_list) + llist_for_each_entry_safe(va, n_va, valist, purge_list) { + int nr = (va->va_end - va->va_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT; + __free_vmap_area(va); + atomic_sub(nr, &vmap_lazy_nr); + cond_resched_lock(&vmap_area_lock); + } spin_unlock(&vmap_area_lock); return true; } -- 2.1.4