On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 02:33:37AM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 03/02, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > One way to embed try_to_freeze() into kthread_should_stop() might be
> > as follows:
> >
> > int kthread_should_stop(void)
> > {
> > if (kthread_stop_info.k == current)
> > return 1;
> > try_to_freeze();
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> I think this is dangerous. For example, worker_thread() will probably
> need some special actions after return from refrigerator. Also, a kernel
> thread may check kthread_should_stop() in the place where try_to_freeze()
> is not safe.
>
> Perhaps we should introduce a new helper which does this.
Good point -- the return value from try_to_freeze() is lost if one uses
the above approach. About one third of the calls to try_to_freeze()
in 2.6.20 pay attention to the return value.
One approach would be to have a kthread_should_stop_nofreeze() for those
cases, and let the default be to try to freeze.
Is this what you had in mind?
Thanx, Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
