From: Konstantin Khlebnikov [mailto:koc...@gmail.com] > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 3:17 AM, Matthew Wilcox > <mawil...@linuxonhyperv.com> wrote: > > This rather complicated function can be better implemented as an iterator. > > It has only one caller, so move the functionality to the only place that > > needs it. Update the test suite to follow the same pattern. > > Looks good. I suppose this patch could be applied separately.
Yes, a number of these patches stand alone from each other and could easily be separated out. I'm going to put your Reviewed-by: on the patches you've said "Looks good" to. Thanks!
