On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, Kees Cook wrote: > In this case, what about the original < ZERO_SIZE_PTR check Michael > suggested? At least the one use in usercopy.c needs to be fixed, but > otherwise, it should be fine?
Looks like it.
On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, Kees Cook wrote: > In this case, what about the original < ZERO_SIZE_PTR check Michael > suggested? At least the one use in usercopy.c needs to be fixed, but > otherwise, it should be fine?
Looks like it.