4.8-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>


[ Upstream commit e551c32d57c88923f99f8f010e89ca7ed0735e83 ]

At accept() time, it is possible the parent has a non zero
sk_err_soft, leftover from a prior error.

Make sure we do not leave this value in the child, as it
makes future getsockopt(SO_ERROR) calls quite unreliable.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soh...@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/core/sock.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1563,6 +1563,7 @@ struct sock *sk_clone_lock(const struct
                RCU_INIT_POINTER(newsk->sk_reuseport_cb, NULL);
 
                newsk->sk_err      = 0;
+               newsk->sk_err_soft = 0;
                newsk->sk_priority = 0;
                newsk->sk_incoming_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
                atomic64_set(&newsk->sk_cookie, 0);


Reply via email to