On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 08:48:54PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote: > > The dvbdev patch is pretty important, fixes a horrible problem, although the > case for > it to occur is rare. The other two patches are of the "obviously correct - > minimal change" > type. > > If it isnt too much trouble, then yes, it is worth it to push a new release > because of the > dvbdev patch. > > However, please chop the "backported from" and "cherry picked from" lines > from those patches. > I cherry-picked them from Mauro's tree, but he wiped it out and re-pushed > those changes in > before Linus merged them.... so, the actual changesets in Linus' tree have > different hashes. > > (i removed those old hashes from the patches that I posted on linuxtv.org)
I picked up the new patches and did a new release. > As for the 2.6.20.y patches, should I email those to you inline or can you > just grab them from > the linuxtv.org www server? ( http://linuxtv.org/~mkrufky/stable/2.6.20.y/ ) Email is usually better, as that's what my scripts are set up to handle. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
