On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:17:55AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 03:56:30PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 09:59:27AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:29:38AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > Create overscan profiles reducing the displayed zone. > > > > > > > > For each TV standard (PAL and NTSC so far), we create 4 more reduced > > > > modes > > > > by steps of 5% that the user will be able to select. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com> > > > > > > tbh I think if we agree to do this (and that still seems an open question) > > > I think there should be a generic helper to add these overscan modes with > > > increased porches. Anything that only depends upon the sink (and > > > overscanning is something the sink does) should imo be put into a suitable > > > helper library for everyone to share. > > > > > > Or maybe even stash it into the probe helpers and call it for all TV > > > connectors. Definitely not a driver-private thing. > > > > Last time we discussed it, my recollection was that you didn't want to > > have generic code for it, but I'd be happy to implement it. > > > > I'll come up with something like that. > > Well I can flip-flop around with the nonsense I'm sometimes emitting ;-) > Since you called me out, feel free to do whatever you want ...
I also found the generic solution to be a much better solution, so I'll definitely implement it :) Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
