On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:58:30 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:34:25AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> 
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> > > index 0888a879120f..d6c6aa80675f 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> > > @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ static void amd_e400_idle(void)
> > >   if (!amd_e400_c1e_detected) {
> > >           u32 lo, hi;
> > >  
> > > -         rdmsr(MSR_K8_INT_PENDING_MSG, lo, hi);
> > > +         RCU_NONIDLE(rdmsr(MSR_K8_INT_PENDING_MSG, lo, hi));
> > >  
> > >           if (lo & K8_INTP_C1E_ACTIVE_MASK) {
> > >                   amd_e400_c1e_detected = true;  
> 
> OK, so while looking at this again, I don't like this ether :/
> 
> Problem with this one is that it always adds the RCU fiddling overhead,
> even when we're not tracing.
> 
> I could do an rdmsr_notrace() for this one, dunno if its important.

But that would neglect the point of tracing rdmsr. What about:

        /* tracepoints require RCU enabled */
        if (trace_read_msr_enabled())
                RCU_NONIDLE(rdmsr(MSR_K8_INT_PENDING_MSG, lo, hi));
        else
                rdmsr(MSR_K8_INT_PENDING_MSG, lo, hi);

-- Steve

Reply via email to