On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 14:17 +0000, David Howells wrote: > Lukas Wunner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Small nit, checkpatch usually complains that this should be written as > > 12-character SHA-1 followed by the commit subject, i.e. > > > > 0a637ee61247 ("x86/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary boot services") > > In this case, checkpatch is wrong.
Why do you think so?
