On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 11:09 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > Not a big fan of that part.. would not something like the below cure > that? > > It would be slightly less optimal for Power7 but would actually be > faster (on average) for the ITMT case, but most importantly, it does > away with that extra weak function.
Okay. I have made this change to get rid off the extra weak function. However, two patches are affected. So I think it is cleaner to refresh the whole patch set. I'll send out the refreshed v8 patch set separately. Thanks. Tim
