On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:07:16PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Fengguang Wu <[email protected]> wrote:

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 02:04:42PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:

I also noticed that the kernel test robot had screwed up the
participants list for some reason, and had

 "Acked-by: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>, David S.
Miller" <[email protected]>

as one of the participants. So there's some odd commit parsing issue
there somewhere. But Alexander seems to have seen this report despite
that, it just never went anywhere that I can tell.


Yeah the robot will CC all "Acked-by" people in the bug reports.

Shall we limit it to the below TO/CC list?

No. We do want to keep the Acked-by's on the cc.

But you missed the real problem.

It *didn't* cc the acked-by. Look closer. What happened was that it cc'd this:

"Acked-by: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>, David S. Miller"

<[email protected]>

ie there is only _one_ email address (that of [email protected]),
and the whole "Acked-by: Alexander Duyck <...>" part is quoted as the
_name_ of that email address.

At least that's what the headers look like for me in the original report:

  From: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
  To: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
  Cc: [email protected], Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>,
LKML <[email protected]>, Alexei Starovoitov
<[email protected]>, Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]>, "Acked-by:
Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>, David S. Miller"
<[email protected]>

Notice the quoting of that last "name".

Ah thanks! Xiaolong just root caused the parse error and will fix it.

Interestingly we didn't see that problem -- the CC list looks correct
in our emails -- perhaps Intel's email system auto fixed up the header.

Thanks,
Fengguang

Reply via email to