On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 05:40:58 -0500 Jessica Yu <[email protected]> wrote:
> +++ Aaron Tomlin [07/11/16 11:46 +0000]: > >Hi Jessica, > > > >Any thoughts? > > Hi Aaron, > > Thanks for your patience as I slowly work through a large swath of emails :-) > > Anyway, this looks fine to me. A going module's text should be (or > soon will be) rw anyway, so checking for going modules in the ro > case should be enough. > > Rusty, if you give your ack for the second patch, I can apply both > patches to my modules-next branch. I'll also incorporate Steven's > suggestion for a comment explaining why going modules shouldn't be > converted to ro in this context. > Hi Jessica, Have you pulled these in? I haven't noticed them in linux-next. -- Steve
