Brian Norris <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:50:16PM +0000, Luis Henriques wrote: >> This patch was triggered by the following Coccinelle error: >> >> ./drivers/mtd/maps/sc520cdp.c:246:3-9: \ >> ERROR: missing iounmap; ioremap on line 242 \ >> and execution via conditional on line 244 >> >> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <[email protected]> >> --- >> drivers/mtd/maps/sc520cdp.c | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/maps/sc520cdp.c b/drivers/mtd/maps/sc520cdp.c >> index 093edd51bdc7..7a27ed345d0d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mtd/maps/sc520cdp.c >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/maps/sc520cdp.c >> @@ -243,6 +243,10 @@ static int __init init_sc520cdp(void) >> >> if (!sc520cdp_map[i].virt) { >> printk("Failed to ioremap_nocache\n"); >> + if (i) { >> + while (--i) > > Umm, so you never unmap from sc520cdp_map[0].virt? How about: > > while (--i >= 0) > > ? > > You can also skip the 'if (i)' part in that case. Or maybe make it a for > loop, to be even clearer. > >> + iounmap(sc520cdp_map[i].virt); > > This may often be a double-iounmap. If you take a look later in the > loop, many instances of the loop may not find a device, and so they'll > unmap this memory and move on. You're just doing it a second time for > them. > >> + } >> return -EIO; >> } >> > > Please put some more care into your patch, since I very much expect that > you did not test it. > > Brian
Thank you very much for your review. All very good points indeed! I'll try to send v2 soon to cover all the issues you've found. Cheers, -- Luís
