On 11/22/2016 10:31 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Tetsuo Handa wrote: >> John Johansen wrote: >>>> In order to minimize the burden of reviewing, this patchset implements >>>> only functionality of checking program execution requests (i.e. execve() >>>> system call) using pathnames. I'm planning to add other functionalities >>>> after this version got included into mainline. You can find how future >>>> versions of CaitSith will look like at http://caitsith.osdn.jp/ . >>>> >>> Thanks I've started working my way through this, but it is going to take >>> me a while. >>> >> >> Thank you for your time. > > May I hear the status? Is there something I can do other than waiting? > progressing very slowly, I have some time over the next few days as its a long weekend here in the US some hopefully I can finish this up
> I wrote a full manual for this patchset as > http://caitsith.osdn.jp/index2.html . thanks > Does anybody have fundamental objection against CaitSith? > I don't have any objections to CaitSith, but I do worry about the maintenance of Tomoyo. It feels like there should be a better migration path for Tomoyo users to CaitSith so that you only have to maintain one of them.
