From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>

Any fields not defined in an arm64_ftr_bits entry are propagated to the
system-wide register value in init_cpu_ftr_reg(), and while we require
that these strictly match for the sanity checks, we don't update them in
update_cpu_ftr_reg().

Generally, the lack of an arm64_ftr_bits entry indicates that the bits
are currently RES0 (as is the case for the upper 32 bits of all
supposedly 32-bit registers).

A better default would be to use zero for the system-wide value of
unallocated bits, making all register checking consistent, and allowing
for subsequent simplifications to the arm64_ftr_bits arrays.

This patch updates init_cpu_ftr_reg() to treat unallocated bits as RES0
for the purpose of the system-wide safe value. These bits will still be
sanity checked with strict match requirements, as is currently the case.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poul...@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poul...@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 12 +++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index c02504e..a6ecf51 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -409,23 +409,33 @@ static void __init sort_ftr_regs(void)
 /*
  * Initialise the CPU feature register from Boot CPU values.
  * Also initiliases the strict_mask for the register.
+ * Any bits that are not covered by an arm64_ftr_bits entry are considered
+ * RES0 for the system-wide value, and must strictly match.
  */
 static void __init init_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_reg, u64 new)
 {
        u64 val = 0;
        u64 strict_mask = ~0x0ULL;
+       u64 valid_mask = 0;
+
        const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftrp;
        struct arm64_ftr_reg *reg = get_arm64_ftr_reg(sys_reg);
 
        BUG_ON(!reg);
 
        for (ftrp  = reg->ftr_bits; ftrp->width; ftrp++) {
+               u64 ftr_mask = arm64_ftr_mask(ftrp);
                s64 ftr_new = arm64_ftr_value(ftrp, new);
 
                val = arm64_ftr_set_value(ftrp, val, ftr_new);
+
+               valid_mask |= ftr_mask;
                if (!ftrp->strict)
-                       strict_mask &= ~arm64_ftr_mask(ftrp);
+                       strict_mask &= ~ftr_mask;
        }
+
+       val &= valid_mask;
+
        reg->sys_val = val;
        reg->strict_mask = strict_mask;
 }
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to