On Friday, November 25, 2016 8:48:53 PM CET Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> writes: > > > The camera_supply_dummy_device definition is shared between a780 and a910, > > but only provided when the first is enabled and fails to build for a > > configuration with only a910: > > > > arch/arm/mach-pxa/ezx.c:1097:3: error: 'camera_supply_dummy_device' > > undeclared here (not in a function) > > > > This moves the definition into its own section. > > > > Fixes: 6c1b417adc8f ("ARM: pxa: ezx: use the new pxa_camera platform_data") > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> > > Ah yes, I'll queue that up in pxa/fixes. > > This also means that you have a test robot which beats my Jenkins, as mine > didn't complain. Do you have a specific defconfig or is it a randconfig which > reveals that ? >
It showed up in randconfig builds, two out of several hundred. I'm not surprised that nobody else caught it. Arnd