On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 15:13:14 +0100 Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> Jon, should we document that we want a very light-handed approach to rst > markup in kernel docs? This has come up a few times now, and irrespective > of what exactly we're going to do with atomic_ops.txt I think it would > help with making txt->rst conversions palatable to the core kernel > community. And it's knida my own preference too ... I think that makes sense, yes. We just have to decide what a light-handed approach actually is... jon
