On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 07:06:39PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Aaron Lu <aaron...@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Here is a fix patch, sorry for the trouble.
> 
> I don't think you tested this one.. You've now essentially reverted
> 5d1904204c99 entirely by making the new force_flush logic a no-op.

Right, I just did a build test.
Now I'm doing more tests, sorry for being careless.

Regards,
Aaron

> 
> > +               pmd = pmdp_huge_get_and_clear(mm, old_addr, old_pmd);
> >                 if (pmd_present(*old_pmd) && pmd_dirty(*old_pmd))
> >                         force_flush = true;
> 
> You need to be testing "pmd", not "*old_pmd".
> 
> Because now "*old_pmd" will be zeroes.
> 
> >                 if (pte_present(*old_pte) && pte_dirty(*old_pte))
> >                         force_flush = true;
> 
> Similarly here. You need to check "pte", not "*old_pte".
> 
>             Linus
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majord...@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"d...@kvack.org";> em...@kvack.org </a>

Reply via email to