Hi!

We're apparently misunderstanding each other, I meant only that last
#ifdef in the v2 review... Sorry for not being clearer, new attempt
below.

Cheers,
Peter

On 2016-11-29 04:46, tnhu...@apm.com wrote:
> From: Tin Huynh <tnhu...@apm.com>
> 
> This patch enables ACPI support for mux-pca954x driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tin Huynh <tnhu...@apm.com>
> 
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c |   25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> Change from V2:
>  -Remove CONFIG_ACPI.
> 
> Change from V1:
>  -Don't shadow id variable.
>  -Include sorted header.
>  -Redefine acpi_device_id.
>  -Add CONFIG_ACPI.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c 
> b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
> index 1091346..f80191e 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
>   * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
>   */
>  
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>  #include <linux/device.h>
>  #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
>  #include <linux/i2c.h>
> @@ -120,6 +121,19 @@ struct pca954x {
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, pca954x_id);
>  

#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI

> +static const struct acpi_device_id pca954x_acpi_ids[] = {
> +     { .id = "PCA9540", .driver_data = pca_9540 },
> +     { .id = "PCA9542", .driver_data = pca_9540 },
> +     { .id = "PCA9543", .driver_data = pca_9543 },
> +     { .id = "PCA9544", .driver_data = pca_9544 },
> +     { .id = "PCA9545", .driver_data = pca_9545 },
> +     { .id = "PCA9546", .driver_data = pca_9545 },
> +     { .id = "PCA9547", .driver_data = pca_9547 },
> +     { .id = "PCA9548", .driver_data = pca_9548 },
> +     { }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, pca954x_acpi_ids);

#endif

> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_OF
>  static const struct of_device_id pca954x_of_match[] = {
>       { .compatible = "nxp,pca9540", .data = &chips[pca_9540] },
> @@ -245,8 +259,16 @@ static int pca954x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>       match = of_match_device(of_match_ptr(pca954x_of_match), &client->dev);
>       if (match)
>               data->chip = of_device_get_match_data(&client->dev);
> -     else
> +     else if (id)
>               data->chip = &chips[id->driver_data];
> +     else {
> +             const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_id;
> +
> +             acpi_id = acpi_match_device(pca954x_acpi_ids, &client->dev);

                acpi_id = acpi_match_device(ACPI_PTR(pca954x_acpi_ids),
                                            &client->dev);

> +             if (!acpi_id)
> +                     return -ENODEV;
> +             data->chip = &chips[acpi_id->driver_data];
> +     }
>  
>       data->last_chan = 0;               /* force the first selection */
>  
> @@ -321,6 +343,7 @@ static int pca954x_resume(struct device *dev)
>               .name   = "pca954x",
>               .pm     = &pca954x_pm,
>               .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(pca954x_of_match),
> +             .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(pca954x_acpi_ids),
>       },
>       .probe          = pca954x_probe,
>       .remove         = pca954x_remove,
> 

Reply via email to