On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 01:50:04PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > From: Matthew Wilcox <mawil...@microsoft.com> > > Hi Andrew, > > Please include these patches in the -mm tree for 4.10. Mostly these > are improvements; the only bug fixes in here relate to multiorder > entries (which are unused in the 4.9 tree). The IDR rewrite has the > highest potential for causing mayhem as the test suite is quite spartan. > We have an Outreachy intern scheduled to work on the test suite for the > 2016 winter season, so hopefully it will improve soon. > > I did not include Konstantin's suggested change to the API for > radix_tree_iter_resume(). Many of the callers do not currently care > about the size of the entry they are consuming, and determining that > information is not always trivial. Since this is not a performance > critical API (it's called when we've paused iterating through a tree > in order to schedule for a higher priority task), I think it's more > important to have a simpler interface. > > I'd like to thank Kiryl for all the testing he's been doing. He's found > at least two bugs which weren't related to the API extensions that he > really wanted from this patch set.
Tested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com> I would like to get in as my ext4 patchset depends on this. -- Kirill A. Shutemov
