On 11/29/2016 10:34 AM, John Stultz wrote:
I've found that by just turning the chip on and off via the
POWER_DOWN register, I end up getting i2c_transfer errors
on HiKey.

Investigating further, it seems some of the register state
in the regmap cache is somehow getting lost. Using the logic
in __adv7511_power_on/off() which syncs and dirtys the cache
avoids this issue.

Thus this patch changes the EDID probing logic so that we
re-use the __adv7511_power_on/off() calls.

Cc: David Airlie <[email protected]>
Cc: Archit Taneja <[email protected]>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <[email protected]>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <[email protected]>
---
v2: Split into two patches to make the change more clear.
    Also provided more rational as to why the change is
    important.

 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c | 17 +++--------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c
index 1948968..487b33d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c
@@ -559,24 +559,13 @@ static int adv7511_get_modes(struct adv7511 *adv7511,
        unsigned int count;

        /* Reading the EDID only works if the device is powered */
-       if (!adv7511->powered) {
-               regmap_update_bits(adv7511->regmap, ADV7511_REG_POWER,
-                                  ADV7511_POWER_POWER_DOWN, 0);
-               if (adv7511->i2c_main->irq) {
-                       regmap_write(adv7511->regmap, ADV7511_REG_INT_ENABLE(0),
-                                    ADV7511_INT0_EDID_READY);
-                       regmap_write(adv7511->regmap, ADV7511_REG_INT_ENABLE(1),
-                                    ADV7511_INT1_DDC_ERROR);
-               }
-               adv7511->current_edid_segment = -1;
-       }
+       if (!adv7511->powered)
+               __adv7511_power_on(adv7511);

In terms of changes in terms of register configurations, replacing with
__adv7511_power_on() here would add a register write to ADV7511_REG_POWER2
as discussed before.

Also, after the patch that enables HPD, we'd also be adding the ADV7511_INT0_HPD
bit in ADV7511_REG_INT_ENABLE(0).

I am not entirely sure about what effect adding POWER2 would have. If we don't
see any negative effects because of it, I think we should be fine.

The extra HPD bit in INT_ENABLE(0) shouldn't be a problem, though. In fact, it
prevents the HPD mask from being cleared after we get_modes is called, which may
have resulted in us missing out on HPD interrupts.

Thanks,
Archit


        edid = drm_do_get_edid(connector, adv7511_get_edid_block, adv7511);

        if (!adv7511->powered)
-               regmap_update_bits(adv7511->regmap, ADV7511_REG_POWER,
-                                  ADV7511_POWER_POWER_DOWN,
-                                  ADV7511_POWER_POWER_DOWN);
+               __adv7511_power_off(adv7511);

        kfree(adv7511->edid);
        adv7511->edid = edid;


--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Reply via email to