4.8-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com>

commit ec638db8cb9ddd5ca08b23f2835b6c9c15eb616d upstream.

Commit 3105f234e0aba43e44e277c20f9b32ee8add43d4 replaced module
cpu id table with a cpu feature check, which is logically correct.
But we need the module device table to allow module auto loading.

Fixes:3105f234 thermal/powerclamp: correct cpu support check
Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zh...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c |    9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
@@ -669,9 +669,16 @@ static struct thermal_cooling_device_ops
        .set_cur_state = powerclamp_set_cur_state,
 };
 
+static const struct x86_cpu_id __initconst intel_powerclamp_ids[] = {
+       { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, X86_FAMILY_ANY, X86_MODEL_ANY, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT },
+       {}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, intel_powerclamp_ids);
+
 static int __init powerclamp_probe(void)
 {
-       if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MWAIT)) {
+
+       if (!x86_match_cpu(intel_powerclamp_ids)) {
                pr_err("CPU does not support MWAIT");
                return -ENODEV;
        }


Reply via email to