On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote: > Davide Libenzi a écrit : > > ChangeLog: > > > > v2) In v1, I was trying to avoid to get the spinlock twice WRT yesterday > > patch, but it turns out I can't since the ready list will be travelling > > through a path w/out the ep->sem held. Oh well... > > > > > > What about the epitem->revents that we agreed to suppress ? > > Me confused...
Me and Pine too :) Of course revents is gone, posted wrong thing. Damn it! - Davide
