On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 14:22 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> So a far as I can tell, this patch series is intended to
> address Al's review comments against the
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161011053352.27645.83962.st...@pluto.themaw.net
> series?

That's right and also to fix an additional problem I found in subsequent testing
(the may_umount_tree() changes).

Ian

Reply via email to