Hi Dmitry,

On Nov 30 2016 or thereabouts, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:08:18AM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > From: Lyude Paul <thatsly...@gmail.com>
> > 
> > This adds basic functionality for PS/2 passthrough on Synaptics
> > Touchpads using RMI4 through smbus.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Duggan <adug...@synaptics.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <thatsly...@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com>
> > 
> > ---
> >  drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-base.c |   6 +
> >  drivers/input/rmi4/Kconfig         |   9 ++
> >  drivers/input/rmi4/Makefile        |   1 +
> >  drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.c       |   3 +
> >  drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.h    |   1 +
> >  drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f03.c       | 227 
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/uapi/linux/serio.h         |   1 +
> >  7 files changed, 248 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f03.c
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-base.c 
> > b/drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-base.c
> > index fb4b185..691dd74 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-base.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-base.c
> > @@ -1663,6 +1663,12 @@ static struct serio_device_id psmouse_serio_ids[] = {
> >             .id     = SERIO_ANY,
> >             .extra  = SERIO_ANY,
> >     },
> > +   {
> > +           .type   = SERIO_RMI_PSTHRU,
> 
> Why do we need new serio type here? We had SERIO_PS_PSTHRU because we
> needed some quirks in how it interacted with the parent PS/2 port, but
> here it seems SERIO_I8042 (which could be called SERIO_STANDARD_PS2)
> would suffice?

I guess this must be some kind of left over from the time we were trying
to fix the suspend/resume interactions between this driver and the PS/2
connection of the rmi-smbus devices.

Given the rest of the code which seems to be indeed not dependent of
SERIO_RMI_PSTHRU, I'll switch over to SERIO_I8042.

> 
> > +           .proto  = SERIO_ANY,
> > +           .id     = SERIO_ANY,
> > +           .extra  = SERIO_ANY,
> > +   },
> >     { 0 }
> >  };
> >  
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/Kconfig b/drivers/input/rmi4/Kconfig
> > index a9c36a5..b8189a3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/Kconfig
> > @@ -39,6 +39,15 @@ config RMI4_SMB
> >       To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will be
> >       called rmi_smbus.
> >  
> > +config RMI4_F03
> > +        bool "RMI4 Function 03 (PS2 Guest)"
> > +        depends on RMI4_CORE
> > +        help
> > +          Say Y here if you want to add support for RMI4 function 03.
> > +
> > +          Function 03 provides PS2 guest support for RMI4 devices. This
> > +          includes support for TrackPoints on TouchPads.
> > +
> >  config RMI4_2D_SENSOR
> >     bool
> >     depends on RMI4_CORE
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/Makefile b/drivers/input/rmi4/Makefile
> > index e7f4ca6..a199cbe 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/Makefile
> > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ rmi_core-y := rmi_bus.o rmi_driver.o rmi_f01.o
> >  rmi_core-$(CONFIG_RMI4_2D_SENSOR) += rmi_2d_sensor.o
> >  
> >  # Function drivers
> > +rmi_core-$(CONFIG_RMI4_F03) += rmi_f03.o
> >  rmi_core-$(CONFIG_RMI4_F11) += rmi_f11.o
> >  rmi_core-$(CONFIG_RMI4_F12) += rmi_f12.o
> >  rmi_core-$(CONFIG_RMI4_F30) += rmi_f30.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.c
> > index 81be9c1..1c40d94 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.c
> > @@ -305,6 +305,9 @@ struct bus_type rmi_bus_type = {
> >  
> >  static struct rmi_function_handler *fn_handlers[] = {
> >     &rmi_f01_handler,
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_RMI4_F03
> > +   &rmi_f03_handler,
> > +#endif
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_RMI4_F11
> >     &rmi_f11_handler,
> >  #endif
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.h 
> > b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.h
> > index cc94585..24f8f76 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.h
> > +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.h
> > @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ static inline void rmi_f34_remove_sysfs(struct 
> > rmi_device *rmi_dev)
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_RMI_F34 */
> >  
> >  extern struct rmi_function_handler rmi_f01_handler;
> > +extern struct rmi_function_handler rmi_f03_handler;
> >  extern struct rmi_function_handler rmi_f11_handler;
> >  extern struct rmi_function_handler rmi_f12_handler;
> >  extern struct rmi_function_handler rmi_f30_handler;
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f03.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f03.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..a7e1b98
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f03.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,227 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2015-2016 Red Hat
> > + * Copyright (C) 2015 Lyude Paul <thatsly...@gmail.com>
> > + *
> > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> > + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as 
> > published by
> > + * the Free Software Foundation.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#include <linux/serio.h>
> > +#include <linux/notifier.h>
> > +#include "rmi_driver.h"
> > +
> > +#define RMI_F03_RX_DATA_OFB                0x01
> > +#define RMI_F03_OB_SIZE                    2
> > +
> > +#define RMI_F03_OB_OFFSET          2
> > +#define RMI_F03_OB_DATA_OFFSET             1
> > +#define RMI_F03_OB_FLAG_TIMEOUT            (1 << 6)
> > +#define RMI_F03_OB_FLAG_PARITY             (1 << 7)
> 
> BIT()?
> 
> > +
> > +#define RMI_F03_DEVICE_COUNT               0x07
> > +#define RMI_F03_BYTES_PER_DEVICE_MASK      0x70
> > +#define RMI_F03_BYTES_PER_DEVICE_SHIFT     4
> > +#define RMI_F03_QUEUE_LENGTH               0x0F
> > +
> > +struct f03_data {
> > +   struct rmi_function *fn;
> > +
> > +   struct serio *serio;
> > +
> > +   unsigned int overwrite_buttons;
> 
> Unused?

Looks like it's a bad split between the F03 core implementation and the
tweaks we have to do for the trackstick "buttons-that-are-wired-into-the-
touchpad-instead-of-the-trackstick".

> 
> > +
> > +   u8 device_count;
> > +   u8 rx_queue_length;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int rmi_f03_pt_write(struct serio *id, unsigned char val)
> > +{
> > +   struct f03_data *f03 = id->port_data;
> > +   int rc;
> > +
> > +   rmi_dbg(RMI_DEBUG_FN, &f03->fn->dev,
> > +           "%s: Wrote %.2hhx to PS/2 passthrough address",
> > +           __func__, val);
> > +
> > +   rc = rmi_write(f03->fn->rmi_dev, f03->fn->fd.data_base_addr, val);
> 
> error = rmi_write()?
> 
> > +   if (rc) {
> > +           dev_err(&f03->fn->dev,
> > +                   "%s: Failed to write to F03 TX register.\n", __func__);
> 
> Please report error code as well.
> 
> > +           return rc;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int rmi_f03_initialize(struct rmi_function *fn)
> 
> Why inline?
> 
> > +{
> > +   struct f03_data *f03;
> > +   struct device *dev = &fn->dev;
> > +   int rc;
> > +   u8 bytes_per_device;
> > +   u8 query1;
> > +   size_t query2_len;
> > +
> > +   rc = rmi_read(fn->rmi_dev, fn->fd.query_base_addr, &query1);
> 
> error = rmi_read()?
> 
> > +   if (rc) {
> > +           dev_err(dev, "Failed to read query register.\n");
> > +           return rc;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   f03 = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct f03_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +   if (!f03)
> > +           return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +   f03->device_count = query1 & RMI_F03_DEVICE_COUNT;
> > +   bytes_per_device = (query1 & RMI_F03_BYTES_PER_DEVICE_MASK) >>
> > +           RMI_F03_BYTES_PER_DEVICE_SHIFT;
> > +
> > +   query2_len = f03->device_count * bytes_per_device;
> > +
> > +   /*
> > +    * The first generation of image sensors don't have a second part to
> > +    * their f03 query, as such we have to set some of these values manually
> > +    */
> > +   if (query2_len < 1) {
> > +           f03->device_count = 1;
> > +           f03->rx_queue_length = 7;
> > +   } else {
> > +           u8 query2[query2_len];
> > +
> > +           rc = rmi_read_block(fn->rmi_dev, fn->fd.query_base_addr + 1,
> > +                               query2, query2_len);
> > +           if (rc) {
> > +                   dev_err(dev, "Failed to read second set of query 
> > registers.\n");
> > +                   return rc;
> > +           }
> > +
> > +           f03->rx_queue_length = query2[0] & RMI_F03_QUEUE_LENGTH;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   f03->fn = fn;
> > +
> > +   dev_set_drvdata(dev, f03);
> > +
> > +   return f03->device_count;
> 
> I'd rather we returned customary 0 here.
> 
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int rmi_f03_register_pt(struct rmi_function *fn)
> > +{
> > +   struct f03_data *f03 = dev_get_drvdata(&fn->dev);
> > +   struct serio *serio = kzalloc(sizeof(struct serio), GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> Please do not do allocations at declaration; limit to declarations with
> initialization to operations without side effect. So:
> 
>       struct serio *serio;
> 
>       serio = kzalloc(sizeof(struct serio), GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (!serio)
>               return -ENOMEM;
> 
> > +
> > +   if (!serio)
> > +           return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +   serio->id.type = SERIO_RMI_PSTHRU;
> > +   serio->write = rmi_f03_pt_write;
> > +   serio->port_data = f03;
> > +
> > +   strlcpy(serio->name, "Synaptics RMI4 PS2 pass-through",
> > +           sizeof(serio->name));
> > +   strlcpy(serio->phys, "synaptics-rmi4-pt/serio1",
> > +           sizeof(serio->phys));
> > +    serio->dev.parent = &fn->dev;
> 
> Extra space after tab in indentation.
> 
> > +
> > +   f03->serio = serio;
> > +
> > +   serio_register_port(serio);
> > +
> > +   return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int rmi_f03_probe(struct rmi_function *fn)
> > +{
> > +   int rc;
> 
> int error;
> 
> Maybe allocate the memory here...
> 
> > +
> > +   rc = rmi_f03_initialize(fn);
> > +   if (rc < 0)
> > +           return rc;
> > +
> > +   rmi_dbg(RMI_DEBUG_FN, &fn->dev, "%d devices on PS/2 passthrough", rc);
> 
> so you can use f03->device_count here.
> 
> Do we need to warn if we see device count greater than 1?

Good quesstion. I can't recall the exact protocol, and we certainly
never seen anything with more than one device. So probably yes, we
should shout something if it's not what we expect.

> 
> > +
> > +   rc = rmi_f03_register_pt(fn);
> > +   if (rc)
> > +           return rc;
> > +
> > +   return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int rmi_f03_config(struct rmi_function *fn)
> > +{
> > +   fn->rmi_dev->driver->set_irq_bits(fn->rmi_dev, fn->irq_mask);
> > +
> > +   return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int rmi_f03_attention(struct rmi_function *fn, unsigned long 
> > *irq_bits)
> > +{
> > +   struct f03_data *f03 = dev_get_drvdata(&fn->dev);
> > +   u16 data_addr = fn->fd.data_base_addr;
> > +   const u8 ob_len = f03->rx_queue_length * RMI_F03_OB_SIZE;
> > +   u8 obs[ob_len];
> > +   u8 ob_status;
> > +   u8 ob_data;
> > +   unsigned int serio_flags;
> > +   int i;
> > +   int retval;
> > +
> > +   /* Grab all of the data registers, and check them for data */
> > +   retval = rmi_read_block(fn->rmi_dev, data_addr + RMI_F03_OB_OFFSET,
> > +                           &obs, ob_len);
> > +   if (retval) {
> > +           dev_err(&fn->dev, "%s: Failed to read F03 output buffers.\n",
> > +                   __func__);
> > +           serio_interrupt(f03->serio, 0, SERIO_TIMEOUT);
> > +           return retval;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   for (i = 0; i < ob_len; i += RMI_F03_OB_SIZE) {
> > +           ob_status = obs[i];
> > +           ob_data = obs[i + RMI_F03_OB_DATA_OFFSET];
> > +           serio_flags = 0;
> > +
> > +           if (!(ob_status & RMI_F03_RX_DATA_OFB))
> > +                   continue;
> > +
> > +           if (ob_status & RMI_F03_OB_FLAG_TIMEOUT)
> > +                   serio_flags |= SERIO_TIMEOUT;
> > +           if (ob_status & RMI_F03_OB_FLAG_PARITY)
> > +                   serio_flags |= SERIO_PARITY;
> > +
> > +           rmi_dbg(RMI_DEBUG_FN, &fn->dev,
> > +                   "%s: Received %.2hhx from PS2 guest T: %c P: %c\n",
> > +                   __func__, ob_data,
> > +                   serio_flags & SERIO_TIMEOUT ?  'Y' : 'N',
> > +                   serio_flags & SERIO_PARITY ? 'Y' : 'N');
> > +
> > +           serio_interrupt(f03->serio, ob_data, serio_flags);
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void rmi_f03_remove(struct rmi_function *fn)
> > +{
> > +   struct f03_data *f03 = dev_get_drvdata(&fn->dev);
> > +
> > +   serio_unregister_port(f03->serio);
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct rmi_function_handler rmi_f03_handler = {
> > +   .driver = {
> > +           .name = "rmi4_f03",
> > +   },
> > +   .func = 0x03,
> > +   .probe = rmi_f03_probe,
> > +   .config = rmi_f03_config,
> > +   .attention = rmi_f03_attention,
> > +   .remove = rmi_f03_remove,
> > +};
> > +
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Lyude Paul <thatsly...@gmail.com>");
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("RMI F03 module");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/serio.h b/include/uapi/linux/serio.h
> > index f2447a8..7012178 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/serio.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/serio.h
> > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> >  #define SERIO_HIL_MLC      0x03
> >  #define SERIO_PS_PSTHRU    0x05
> >  #define SERIO_8042_XL      0x06
> > +#define SERIO_RMI_PSTHRU   0x07
> >  
> >  /*
> >   * Serio protocols
> > -- 
> > 2.7.4
> > 
> 
> Thanks.
> 

I saw that you pushed part of the series. Many thanks for that. I'll
work on the fixes for this one and submit v2 ASAP.

Cheers,
Benjamin

> -- 
> Dmitry

Reply via email to