Hello. On 03.12.2016 17:55, Antonio Ospite wrote: > On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 00:30:52 +0100 > Stefan Schmidt <ste...@datenfreihafen.org> wrote: > >> Hello. >> > > Hi everyone, > >> On 25.11.2016 20:53, Robert Jarzmik wrote: >>> Stefan Schmidt <ste...@datenfreihafen.org> writes: >>> >>>> Hello. >>>> >>>> On 24.11.2016 17:29, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>>>> The camera_supply_dummy_device definition is shared between a780 and a910, >>>>> but only provided when the first is enabled and fails to build for a >>>>> configuration with only a910: >>>>> >>>>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/ezx.c:1097:3: error: 'camera_supply_dummy_device' >>>>> undeclared here (not in a function) >>>>> >>>>> This moves the definition into its own section. >>>>> >>>>> Fixes: 6c1b417adc8f ("ARM: pxa: ezx: use the new pxa_camera >>>>> platform_data") >>>>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> >>>>> --- >>>>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/ezx.c | 56 >>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- >>>> >>>> I wonder what we should do with ezx.c. >>>> >>>> As far as I know neither Daniel nor Harald or myself are doing anything >>>> with this devices anymore. Besides a basic compile test having an ack or >>>> reviewed by from our side is a bit worthless. :/ >>>> >>>> I should still have some of these phones around in a box somewhere. If >>>> there is someone with a good motivation and time to take over on this >>>> platform we will find a way to get the person this devices. >>>> >>>> Any takers? Robert? I guess you are already overloaded but you might >>>> also have an interest. Worth asking :) >>> Oh yes, I'm very interested in your box. Besides I really like old platforms >>> :) >> >> >> Great! I should have at least 3 or 4 different devices from the EZX >> platform around. I will go and search for the box over the weekend :) >> >>>> In the case nobody wants to pick up here what would you consider the >>>> bets way forward? I could send a patch removing ezx platform support >>>> from the kernel (basically ezx.c plus build support) or I can send a >>>> patch marking it at least orphan in MAINTAINERS. Let me know what you >>>> think. >>>> >>>> Daniel, Harald, if one of you is still interested in these and what to >>>> pick up the work again, please speak up now. :) >>> Unless another maintainer steps in, you can submit a patch to transfer the >>> maintainance onto me, and we'll see off mailing lists how we could arange >>> the >>> boards transfer. >> >> I cc'ed another developer who did a lot of work regarding EZX. >> >> Antonio, as you can see from the mail above we are pondering what who >> will maintain the ezx platform in the kernel going forward. Neither >> Daniel, Harald or me is going to do so. If you have time, interest and >> motivation to do so please speak up. I know life moved on and you ahve >> other projects and interests so do not feel pressured here. Just say no >> if you have no interest. Robert already agreed to act as a fallback so >> we would still be safe. :) >> > > I still use a Motorola A1200 with the original EZX stack as my main > phone (and that tells something about how much I use a phone...)
hehe :) > however I haven't touched any OpenEZX stuff in a while. > > I don't think I am going to play with these devices anytime soon, but I > can provide Robert any info he may need about OpenEZX, the development > tools and the out-of-tree patches required to make the phones somewhat > usable. Great. I think this will be a great help for Robert when he tries to get things going. Thanks a lot! Robert, please send me your address details off list so we can arrange for the device shipping. I will send a patch transferring the maintainership for the EZX platform over to you in the next days. regards Stefan Schmidt