On 12/05/2016 04:09 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
The aemif clock is added twice to the lookup table in da850.c. This breaks the children list of pll0_sysclk3 as we're using the same list links in struct clk. When calling clk_set_rate(), we get stuck in propagate_rate().
&emac_clk is used twice in this list as well. Shouldn't we fix it too? I would expect that it causes the same problem.
Create a separate clock for nand, inheriting the rate of the aemif clock and retrieve it in the davinci_nand module. Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]> --- arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c index e770c97..c008e5e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c @@ -367,6 +367,11 @@ static struct clk aemif_clk = { .flags = ALWAYS_ENABLED, }; +static struct clk aemif_nand_clk = { + .name = "nand", + .parent = &aemif_clk, +}; + static struct clk usb11_clk = { .name = "usb11", .parent = &pll0_sysclk4, @@ -537,7 +542,7 @@ static struct clk_lookup da850_clks[] = { CLK("da830-mmc.0", NULL, &mmcsd0_clk), CLK("da830-mmc.1", NULL, &mmcsd1_clk), CLK("ti-aemif", NULL, &aemif_clk), - CLK(NULL, "aemif", &aemif_clk), + CLK(NULL, "aemif", &aemif_nand_clk), CLK("ohci-da8xx", "usb11", &usb11_clk), CLK("musb-da8xx", "usb20", &usb20_clk), CLK("spi_davinci.0", NULL, &spi0_clk),
