Pavel Machek wrote: > Much complexity for little gain. Who is running _without_ CONFIG_PM > these days?
Embedded people, I guess. The problem here is that if we are gonna support !CONFIG_PM configuration and try to reduce the kernel/module images size for such case, we end up sprinkling #ifdef's all over huge number of device drivers. If we determine to drop !CONFIG_PM configuration, I'm happy with that too but we need to determine something here. Alternatives... 1. drop !CONFIG_PM configuration 2. continue to sprinkle #ifdef's over device drivers 3. find out prettier way to mark PM functions -- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
