On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 08:49:36PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > cycles_t is defined as u64, so casting it to u64 is a pointless and > confusing exercise. cycles_t should simply go away and be replaced with a > plain u64 to avoid further confusion. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> ---
> kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> @@ -258,10 +258,9 @@ static void tk_setup_internals(struct ti
> tk->cycle_interval = interval;
>
> /* Go back from cycles -> shifted ns */
> - tk->xtime_interval = (u64) interval * clock->mult;
> + tk->xtime_interval = interval * clock->mult;
> tk->xtime_remainder = ntpinterval - tk->xtime_interval;
> - tk->raw_interval =
> - ((u64) interval * clock->mult) >> clock->shift;
> + tk->raw_interval = (interval * clock->mult) >> clock->shift;
>
> /* if changing clocks, convert xtime_nsec shift units */
> if (old_clock) {
>
>
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
