Hi Stephen > > > I don't see any reason why we need this patch though. The binding > > > works as is, so supporting different styles doesn't seem like a > > > good idea to me. Let's just keep what we have? Even if a sub-node > > > like cpu or codec gets more than one element in the clocks list > > > property, we can make that work by passing a clock-name then > > > based on some sort of other knowledge. > > > > OK, thanks. Let's skip this patch. > > But I believe this idea/method itself is not wrong (?) > > > Right it's not wrong, just seems confusing to have two methods.
Thanks. Very clear for me :)
