Hi Pavel,
Thanks for the update.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 01:24:51PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
...
> +static int et8ek8_set_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
> +{
> + struct et8ek8_sensor *sensor =
> + container_of(ctrl->handler, struct et8ek8_sensor, ctrl_handler);
> +
> + switch (ctrl->id) {
> + case V4L2_CID_GAIN:
> + return et8ek8_set_gain(sensor, ctrl->val);
> +
> + case V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE:
> + {
> + int rows;
> + struct i2c_client *client =
> v4l2_get_subdevdata(&sensor->subdev);
> + rows = ctrl->val;
> + return et8ek8_i2c_write_reg(client, ET8EK8_REG_16BIT, 0x1243,
> + swab16(rows));
Why swab16()? Doesn't the et8ek8_i2c_write_reg() already do the right thing?
16-bit writes aren't used elsewhere... and the register address and value
seem to have different endianness there, it looks like a bug to me in that
function.
--
Regards,
Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ai...@iki.fi XMPP: sai...@retiisi.org.uk
