On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:55:12 +0100 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 14:41 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:09:57 +0100 > > Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 15:41 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > > I mean.... what the hell? > > > > > > > > As you appear to have managed to work out what the sorry thing is > > > > trying to > > > > do, would you have time to simply rip it out and completely rewrite it, > > > > including a nice comment telling the world what this function's > > > > function is? > > > > > > > > Because what we have there is beyond repairing. > > > > > > Something like so? > > > Boots uml seemingly without errors. > > > > > > --- > > > Rewrite remove_arg_zero() to be more parseable by untwisted minds. > > > > > > > Sorry, Nick already had a go at this: > > Darn, must've fell off of lkml... or I missed it catching up my 4000+ > email backlog.
Hm, I've had a similar issue. Mail problems or what... --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
