On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:19:17PM +1300, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 08:21:23PM +1300, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >>
> >> And please make the array the last item in the structure so that
> >> expanding or contracting it does not affect the ability to read the rest
> >> of the structure.
> >
> > Sorry, sample_id must be last, because hysterical crud :/
> >
> > (basically because that was the only way to add a field to records like
> > PERF_RECORD_MMAP which used the record length to determine the
> > filename[] length, yes I know, we won't ever do that again).
>
> Why does historical crud need to affect new records?
Because now the userspace parser expects sample_id to be the tail
field. Basically decoding a record now looks like:
if (sample_id_all) {
sample_id = (sample_id *)((char *)record + record->size -
sizeof(sample_id));
record->size -= sizeof(sample_id);
}
/* process record */
We could of course create more exceptions..
> Totally confused. This looks like a major mess.
Not major, but yes, its ugly, but its also ABI :-(
