On 12/22/2016 9:11 AM, Kenneth Lee wrote:
> I catched this bug when reading the code. I'm sorry I have no hardware to test
> it. But it is abviously a bug.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kenneth Lee <liguo...@hisilicon.com>
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c
> index 1e62a5f..4609b92 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c
> @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ struct ib_umem *ib_umem_get(struct ib_ucontext *context, 
> unsigned long addr,
>                IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_ATOMIC | IB_ACCESS_MW_BIND));
>  
>       if (access & IB_ACCESS_ON_DEMAND) {
> +             put_pid(umem->pid);
>               ret = ib_umem_odp_get(context, umem);
>               if (ret) {
>                       kfree(umem);
> @@ -149,6 +150,7 @@ struct ib_umem *ib_umem_get(struct ib_ucontext *context, 
> unsigned long addr,
>  
>       page_list = (struct page **) __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (!page_list) {
> +             put_pid(umem->pid);
>               kfree(umem);
>               return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>       }
> 

Looks good to me. Thanks!

Reviewed-by: Haggai Eran <hagg...@mellanox.com>

Reply via email to