Hi. On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 07:49 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi. > > On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 07:07 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 12:27 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Here is another attempt on x86_64 relocatable bzImage patches(V4). This > > > patchset makes a bzImage relocatable and same kernel binary can be loaded > > > and run from different physical addresses. > > > > > > have these patches been extensively tested with various suspend > > scenarios? (S1,S3,S4 in acpi speak or s2ram and s2disk in Linux speak) > > We did work on this for RHEL5, getting relocatable kernel support > working fine with S4. While doing it and since, I've been running > Suspend2 with the same patch. > > Since that work, Vivek has done more modifications, but I can confirm > that the basic design is reliable with S4. Haven't tried S3, but can do. > Will report back shortly.
S3 works okay here with a relocatable x86_64 kernel (2.6.20). Regards, Nigel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
