* Serge E. Hallyn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Are you objecting only to the duplication at the callsites, so that an > fsnotify-type of consolidation of security and integrity hooks would be > ok? Or are you complaining that the security_inode_setxattr and > integrity_inode_setxattr hooks are too similar anyway, and integrity > modules should just use some lsm hooks for anything which will be > authoritative?
It's duplication of callsites with many identical implementations that's the problem. > (I could see an argument that integirty subsystem should be purely for > measuring and hence its hooks should never return a value. Only hitch > there is that if integrity subsystem hits ENOMEM it should be able to > refuse the action...) Right, that's what I was expecting to see, just the measurement infrastructure. thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
