On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 07:19:56PM +0100, Simon Budig wrote: > On 03/12/16 19:17, Aniroop Mathur wrote: > > Since here we are using msleep(1) which is worse as it sleeps for > > minimum two jiffies so 20 ms on HZ=100 system and we are doing here > > 100 retries if register reading fails. So as you can deduce usleep_range > > will serve better here. > > Explained originally here why to not use msleep for 1-20ms: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/3/250 > > Acked-by: Simon Budig <simon.bu...@kernelconcepts.de>
Applied, thank you. > > Bye, > Simon > -- > kernel concepts GmbH Simon Budig > Sieghuetter Hauptweg 48 simon.bu...@kernelconcepts.de > D-57072 Siegen +49-271-771091-17 > http://www.kernelconcepts.de/ > HR Siegen, HR B 9613; Geschäftsführer: Nils Faerber, Ole Reinhardt > > -- Dmitry
