On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > Ugh. Still can't understand, probably I missed something or misread this > patch. > > If we shift signalfd_notify() from > specific_send_sig_info/__group_send_sig_info > to send_signal(), we have the same "list_empty()" fastpath if no signalfds are > attached to the sighand. The difference is that we don't count sig_ignored() > signals, which looks right to me.
Now I shifted the check into send_signal(), since signalfd now uses the standard dequeue_signal, and hence compete with standard signal delivery against the queue. This was initial Linus design. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
