On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 18:38:48 -0800 Alexander Duyck > <alexander.du...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> This patch series takes care of a few cleanups for the page fragments API. >> >> First we do some renames so that things are much more consistent. First we >> move the page_frag_ portion of the name to the front of the functions >> names. Secondly we split out the cache specific functions from the other >> page fragment functions by adding the word "cache" to the name. >> >> Finally I added a bit of documentation that will hopefully help to explain >> some of this. I plan to revisit this later as we get things more ironed >> out in the near future with the changes planned for the DMA setup to >> support eXpress Data Path. >> >> --- >> >> v2: Fixed a comparison between a void* and 0 due to copy/paste from >> free_pages >> v3: Updated first rename patch so that it is just a rename and doesn't impact >> the actual functionality to avoid performance regression. >> v4: Fix mangling that occured due to a bad merge fix when patches 1 and 2 >> were swapped and then swapped back. >> >> I'm submitting this to Intel Wired Lan and Jeff Kirsher's "next-queue" for >> acceptance as I have a series of other patches for igb that are blocked by >> by these patches since I had to rename the functionality fo draining extra >> references. >> >> This series was going to be accepted for mmotm back when it was v1, however >> since then I found a few minor issues that needed to be fixed. >> >> I am hoping to get an Acked-by from Andrew Morton for these patches and >> then have them submitted to David Miller as he has said he will accept them >> if I get the Acked-by. In the meantime if these can be applied to >> next-queue while waiting on that Acked-by then I can submit the other >> patches for igb and ixgbe for testing. > > The patches look fine. How about I just scoot them straight into > mainline next week? I do that occasionally, just to simplify ongoing > development and these patches are safe enough.
That should work for me. Thanks. - Alex
