4.8-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>

commit 5716863e0f8251d3360d4cbfc0e44e08007075df upstream.

fsnotify_unmount_inodes() plays complex tricks to pin next inode in the
sb->s_inodes list when iterating over all inodes. Furthermore the code has a
bug that if the current inode is the last on i_sb_list that does not have e.g.
I_FREEING set, then we leave next_i pointing to inode which may get removed
from the i_sb_list once we drop s_inode_list_lock thus resulting in
use-after-free issues (usually manifesting as infinite looping in
fsnotify_unmount_inodes()).

Fix the problem by keeping current inode pinned somewhat longer. Then we can
make the code much simpler and standard.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/notify/inode_mark.c |   45 +++++++++------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/notify/inode_mark.c
+++ b/fs/notify/inode_mark.c
@@ -150,12 +150,10 @@ int fsnotify_add_inode_mark(struct fsnot
  */
 void fsnotify_unmount_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
 {
-       struct inode *inode, *next_i, *need_iput = NULL;
+       struct inode *inode, *iput_inode = NULL;
 
        spin_lock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
-       list_for_each_entry_safe(inode, next_i, &sb->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
-               struct inode *need_iput_tmp;
-
+       list_for_each_entry(inode, &sb->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
                /*
                 * We cannot __iget() an inode in state I_FREEING,
                 * I_WILL_FREE, or I_NEW which is fine because by that point
@@ -178,49 +176,24 @@ void fsnotify_unmount_inodes(struct supe
                        continue;
                }
 
-               need_iput_tmp = need_iput;
-               need_iput = NULL;
-
-               /* In case fsnotify_inode_delete() drops a reference. */
-               if (inode != need_iput_tmp)
-                       __iget(inode);
-               else
-                       need_iput_tmp = NULL;
+               __iget(inode);
                spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
-
-               /* In case the dropping of a reference would nuke next_i. */
-               while (&next_i->i_sb_list != &sb->s_inodes) {
-                       spin_lock(&next_i->i_lock);
-                       if (!(next_i->i_state & (I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE)) &&
-                                               atomic_read(&next_i->i_count)) {
-                               __iget(next_i);
-                               need_iput = next_i;
-                               spin_unlock(&next_i->i_lock);
-                               break;
-                       }
-                       spin_unlock(&next_i->i_lock);
-                       next_i = list_next_entry(next_i, i_sb_list);
-               }
-
-               /*
-                * We can safely drop s_inode_list_lock here because either
-                * we actually hold references on both inode and next_i or
-                * end of list.  Also no new inodes will be added since the
-                * umount has begun.
-                */
                spin_unlock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
 
-               if (need_iput_tmp)
-                       iput(need_iput_tmp);
+               if (iput_inode)
+                       iput(iput_inode);
 
                /* for each watch, send FS_UNMOUNT and then remove it */
                fsnotify(inode, FS_UNMOUNT, inode, FSNOTIFY_EVENT_INODE, NULL, 
0);
 
                fsnotify_inode_delete(inode);
 
-               iput(inode);
+               iput_inode = inode;
 
                spin_lock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
        }
        spin_unlock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
+
+       if (iput_inode)
+               iput(iput_inode);
 }


Reply via email to